PROTECTION OF THE SINALOA CARTEL BY BRIBE MONEY TO THE NEW MEXICO SUPREME COURT

IN THE NEW MEXICO SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

NO. S-1-SC-39680

UNDERLYING: New Mexico Court of Appeals No. A-1-CA-40690

New Mexico District Court Cases: 7th District Court: CV-94-10; CV-02-19; D-727-CV-2021-00028

New Mexico District Court Cases 13th District Court: D-1314-CV-2021-00541 -Derringer v. Davis & Derringer v. State of New Mexico et. al.

New Mexico District Court Cases: 2nd District Court: D-202-CV-2014-07755; CV-2022-03437; CV-2018-00514.

David Derringer,

Plaintiff-Petitioner,

V.

Defendants-Respondents,

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, BERNALILLO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, VALENCIA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE, FRANCISCO “CISCO” LOVATO (AS AN INDIVIDUAL), KYM M. DAMAZYN, MIER PEDRO, RAMON MANQUERO, DENNIS CHAVEZ, SOUTHWEST EVENT CENTER LLC, D.C. LIVESTOCK AUCTION, SOUTHWEST LIVESTOCK AUCTION, BENJAMIN BENAVIDEZ JR., BENAVIDEZ RANCH, NEW MEXICO LIVESTOCK BOARD, DARRON SHAWN DAVIS, MICKEY C. CHAPEL, JENNIFER CHAPEL, JOHN CHAPEL, BEN CHAPEL, NM PROFESSIONAL BIG GAME OUTFITTERS, JOHNBEN ENTERPRISES, NM OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER, NM STATE ENGINEER THOMAS TURNEY, NM STATE ENGINEER JOHN D’ANTONIO, CATRON COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, JOHN DOES

PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF BRIEFING; NOTICE OF CONTINUED HORSE LARCENY OF AN ADDITIONAL STOLEN 11 HORSES; NOTICE OF EXTREME VIOLATION OF CANON AND RAMPANT ACCELERATION OF RICO AND TREASON INCLUSIVE OF KNOWLEDGE AND WILLFUL COURT PARTICIPATION

COMES NOW the Petitioner David Derringer Pro-Se with his Notice of Completion of briefing and Appurtenant Notices.

On April 20, 2023 Plaintiff/Petitioner David Derringer filed two Motions supported by detailed included written pleading witness testimony of Derringer, as well as tangible exhibits of confirming photographs, with a Motion for Order of Cease and Desist. This pleading also included; appurtenant Notices for the Court to thus “have knowledge” of crimes of Title 18 Section 1959-Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity continual within the Court, State v. Shafer, 698, P.2d 902, 102 N.M. 629 Cert denied 698 p.2d 886, 102 N.M. 613. [1] and Motion for Sanctions against named defendants and against the NM Supreme court acting in provable bias, [2] prejudice, fraud on the court, being not only blocking the Petitioner in crimes of treason and obstruction of justice, but actually being an active advocate, protector, facilitator and advisor participant in assisting the foreign invading Mexican National Sinaloa Cartel and other 150+ country terrorist invaders to be held harmless for all criminal and torts not only against Derringer, but against all citizens of the United States of America. Briefing is complete as none of the Defendants opposed either the valid sustained Motion for Cease and Desist Order, nor was there any timely opposition to the Motion for Sanctions of the named Defendants or illegal “intervenor” and also no opposition or complaint from the accountable violations by the illegal acts without jurisdiction or judicial capacity of the New Mexico Supreme Court. The NM Supreme Court is verifiably proven each time in multiple “neglect to prevent:” instances as are provided as FACTS by Derringer as well as the former underlying acts of FRAUD ON THE COURT, wherein such took all jurisdiction and judicial capacity from the NM Supreme Court. The Notices of ongoing obstruction of justice and continued treason facilitation of the invading Mexican National Sinaloa Cartel by all Defendants of all 9 underlying cases with complete collusion of all New Mexico Courts are the most egregious and illegal acts imaginable in America. This is coupled with the refusal, oppression, tyranny and absolute obstruction and deprivation of rights for the NM Supreme Court adamantly blocking justice mandated to delegate all of these matters to the US Federal 10th Circuit District Court for the District of New Mexico. As a higher Court of equity beyond the subversion of the New Mexico Supreme Court, it is this higher Court that would have the proper jurisdiction to entertain all Motions by Derringer, not the NM Supreme Court that lost jurisdiction and judicial capacity by performing FRAUD ON THE COURT. Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Co., 86 N.M. 405, 524 P.2d 1021 (Ct. App. 1974) aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 88 N.M. 299, 540 p.2d 229 (1975). ; McBeth v. Nissan Motor Corp. USA, 921 F. Supp. 1473 “DSC 1996

The founding fathers in US Constitution Article III envisioned a fair and impartial judiciary wherein justice could be served in total equity of all law for “We The People”. At no time some Communist coup of radicals should be able to ascend to the position of “Judges or Justices” as has occurred in New Mexico to then take Sinaloa Cartel bribes while in judicial robes used to aid foreign invaders in treason, or use thereof to defeat and persecute litigant Derringer. [3] US v. Andreas, 39 F. Supp.2d 1048 ND Ill. 1998 “Obstruction of justice statute is construed broadly to include the various corrupt methods by which the proper administration of justice may be impeded or thwarted; variety limited only by the imagination of the criminally inclined.” 18 USCA 1503. The violations of the US Criminal Code are excruciating by the NM Judiciary itself, wherein notably, the non-opposition both to Derringer’s Motion for “relief order” and Motion for Sanctions are obviously not responded to for “knowledge” that the public and judicial protection is clearly in place by the NM Supreme Court to hold harmless all Judges, Justices, all Defendants, all attorneys, all foreign invaders, all domestic terrorist traitor Americans assisting the Sinaloa Cartel with all NM State employees, politicians and officials involved. Canon makes it impossible to conduct the Courts in such manner under use of FRAUD ON THE COURT. The NM Supreme Court, of itself, and as superintending control mandates of every underlying Judges of every subservient lower NM Courts is Canon 3 (B)(2) that a judge shall be faithful to the law as a mandated by both Canon and Oath to be “faithful to the law” is not an option. US v. Anderson, 798 F.2d 919 CA7 (Ind.) 1986. The atrocities occurring here in obstruction defile America with no rule of law, no impartiality and no morality or justice. “Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 3, Subd. A(4) and C(1)(a); In re Bernard, 31 F.3d 842 CA9 1994 “Under canons of judicial ethics, every judicial officer must satisfy himself that he is actually unbiased toward parties and that his impartiality is not reasonably subject to question.” With inclusive appurtenant Judges and Justices in all underlying 9 cases obviously taking Sinaloa Cartel money offering ”Mafioso protection” for the Cartel includes Judicial personal gain of RICO not only ruining Derringer’s life but also killing US Citizens with fentanyl, pedophiles raping minors and such debased activities as to shock the conscience of any rational human being in America. In re Rochkind, 128 B.R. 520 Mich. 1991 “To use power of public office as Judge (Justice) to ruin another for personal gain plainly violates several provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct Canons 1, 2, 3, 5; Such conduct may also constitute crimes; Canons 1-3, 5.” The NM Supreme Court Justices as all Judges underlying have no immunity doing these atrocities to David Derringer. Tucker v. Outwater, 118 F.3d 930 cert denied 118 S. Ct. 562, 522 US 997, 139 L.Ed.2d 402 “Judge will be denied immunity for damages where he acts in clear absence of all jurisdiction, and knew or must have known that he was acting in such manner.” : Shucher v. Rockwood, 846 F.2d 1202 rehearing denied, cert denied 109 S. Ct. 561, 488 US 995 102 L.Ed.2d 587 “Judge loses his absolute immunity from damage actions when he acts in the clear absence of all jurisdiction, or performs an act which is not judicial in nature.” ; Owen v. City of Independence, US Supreme Court 445 US 622 (1980) No. 78-1779. “The innocent individual who is harmed by an abuse of governmental authority”; Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) “A judge will be subject to liability when he has acted in the clear absence of all jurisdiction.”

THEREFORE, it is mandated that the New Mexico Supreme Court instantly delegate these matters to the US Federal 10th Circuit District Court for the District of New Mexico and stop facilitation of the Sinaloa Cartel constantly stealing horse rustling against David Derringer and be accountable, mandated replevin, NMSA 29-1-1 and 29-1-2 conformity, and extreme damages, affirmed sanctions against all requested, and enable Derringer to achieve “justice” totally denied by the New Mexico Supreme Court by their obstruction and FRAUD ON THE COURT proven to "defile the court itself," perpetrated by NM Judges and Justices themselves "so that the judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudicating cases, designed with Sinaloa Cartel bribery to "corrupt the judicial process" and entirely to "subvert the integrity of the court." marked by an "unconscionable plan or scheme which is designed to improperly influence the court in its decisions by "egregious misconduct directed to the court itself.” Oxxford Clothes XX, Inc. v. Expeditors Int'l, Inc., 127 F.3d 574, 578 (7th Cir. 1997); Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1995) (citation omitted); Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Area Boliviana, 24 F.3d 457, 460 (2d Cir. 1994): Dixon v. Commissioner, No. 00-70858, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 4831, at *11-12 (9th Cir. Mar. 18, 2003), amending 316 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir. 2003), or " Greiner v. City of Champlin, 152 F.3d 787, 789 (8th Cir. 1998) (citation omitted).

Respectfully submitted by ___________________________________________

David Derringer Pro-Se Box 7431, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87194

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 5-7-2023

I hereby certify that I sent a copy of this Pleading to the New Mexico Supreme Court by 1st class mail at 237 Don Gaspar Ave STE 104, Santa Fe, NM 87501

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE to attorneys stated in web site.

https://d2bowman4570.wixsite.com/notices

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 5-7-2023

I hereby certify that I sent a copy of this Notice to the New Mexico Supreme Court by 1st class mail at 237 Don Gaspar Ave STE 104, Santa Fe, NM 87501

Daniel Macke, 8206 Louisiana Blvd. NE Ste. A, Albuquerque New Mexico 87113

Leif C. Rasmussen 2105 Osuna Road NE Albuquerque, NM 87113

Charles N. Lakins, Esq. P.O. Box 91357 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87199

Carlos Quinones 1223 S. Saint Francis Dr. Ste. C Santa Fe, NM 87505

John D’Amato Jr. PO Box 7888, Albuquerque, NM 87194

Judge Murphy 7th District Court 7th District Court P.O. Drawer 1129 Socorro, NM 88901

Judge Mercer 13th Judicial District Court 1835 NM-314 Los Lunas, New Mexico 87031

Judge Ortega 2nd District Court 400 Lomas NW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

Judge Medina Ct. App. Judge Hanisee Ct. App. Judge Borgardus Ct. App. Judge Henderson Ct. App. 2211 Tucker Ave. NE Albuquerque, NM 87106

[1] Martinez v. Winner, 771 F.2d 424 opinion modified on denial of rehearing 778 F.2d 553, cert granted, vacated; Tyus v. Martinez, 106 Supreme Court 1787, 475 US 1138, 90 L.Ed.2d 333 on remand 800 F.2d 230 “A judge is not only entitled, but also has a duty to take all lawful measures reasonably necessary to prevent the occurrence of a crime in his courtroom.” [2] In re Bernard, 31 F.3d 842 CA9 1994 [3] Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S., at 184 “Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law. Congress sought to enforce the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment against those who carry a badge of authority of a State and represent it in some capacity, whether they act in accordance with their authority or misuse it.”